ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Comparison of Conventional Adult Out-of-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Against a Concept With Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation - LINC Study
The primary objective is to show superiority in survival of the modified method with the LUCAS Chest Compression System, compared to the conventional manual resuscitation method in patients suffering from out of hospital sudden cardiac arrest.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Broken Links: Gender Disparities Across the Chain of Survival in Out‐Of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest#623327
- Using a Stifneck Select Collar$^{\mathrm{TM}}$ for hands-free semiautomatic blood flow measurements: a user study#1076825
- Experiences and perceptions of lay bystanders responding to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A qualitative systematic review.#670906
- STUMBL vs TTSS in Predicting Morbidity and Mortality of Blunt Chest Trauma#981390
- Study of the Effect of Four Methods of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Instruction on Psychosocial Response of Parents With Infants at Risk of Sudden Death#208330
Record · ID 1060294
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive