ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Healing of Bone/Soft Tissue to Different Abutment Biomaterials and the Impact on Marginal Bone Loss
In patients that require a dental implant, does zirconia compared to titanium, or cad-cam acrylic abutments, provide less inflammation, marginal bone loss or infection during the osseointegration period ?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Scan Time and Prosthetic Complications of Intraoral Scanning Versus Intraoral Photogrammetry for Full-Arch Titanium Framework With Zirconia Overlay Implant Screw-Retained Prostheses#1127888
- Assessment of Bone Density Following Application of BMAC Around Zygomatic Implant#829136
- Prosthetic Complications in Full-arch Screw-retained Implant Restorations Using Monolithic Zirconia Versus Titanium Frameworks: A Randomized Clinical Trial#894303
- Avaliação da influência de diferentes superfícies na adesão e proliferação de osteoblastos humanos#935064
- Characterizing the Inflammation Around Dental Implants: Bacterial Infection, Hypersensitivity or Both?#884138
Record · ID 1060368
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive