ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Prospective Double-blinded Randomised Comparison of Profix Mobile to Fixed Bearing Knee Replacements
This is a randomised control trial comparing two different prosthetic designs used in total knee arthroplasty. Participants were randomised to receive either of the two prostheses and then were followed up of a period of 7 years, looking at pain, range of motion and impact on quality of life. The literature and joint registry of Australia shows that one of the prosthesis may be inferior to the other. Our research team hypothesised that this was not the case and that previous elicited differences were related to other factors.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing All-Polyethylene Tibia Total Knee Designs#1094818
- Comparison of Ways to Prepare Patients for Decisions About Joint Replacement Surgery#910675
- Persona Partial Knee Study#969460
- Prospective Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Complications in Medial Knee Prostheses: Fixed Bearing Versus Mobile Bearing Design#994393
- Digitally Supported Short-Term Prehabilitation Before Total Knee Replacement#1030483
Record · ID 1060675
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive