ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion During Cesarean Section (CS) Versus Delayed Insertion
After ethical committee approval and written consent from the patients, this prospective quasi-randomized controlled clinical trial was performed on pregnant women planning to deliver by cesarean section and willing to participate in the study to investigate the value of immediate post placental IUD insertion versus delayed insertion on patient's compliance in Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital (ASUMH).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Postplacental Insertion of Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) After Cesarean vs. Interval Insertion#883957
- IUCD Insertion in Patients Delivered by Cesarean Section#1125956
- Delays in Cesarean Sections: Lessons Learned from Canadian Medico-legal Obstetrical Case Files#151345
- Delays in Cesarean Sections: Lessons Learned from Canadian Medico-legal Obstetrical Case Files.#148533
- PAFP Provider Feedback Trial in Nepal#1125072
Record · ID 1060719
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive