ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Prospective Random Comparing Study on EUS-guided Pseudocyst Drainage by Naso-pancreatic Tube and Stents
EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage has been used world widely. Now, most endoscopists tend to place several stents to drain the content of cyst into GI tract. In the investigators experience, a modified naso-pancreatic tube drainage was more safer, easier and cheaper than placement of stents. Moreover, none of pseudocysts(total 19) drained by this modified naso-pancreatic tube drainage method were found recurrent with a follow up period from 3 months-34 months. So, the investigators designed this prospective random comparing study to confirm the result.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Registry of the PROmus™, ENdeavor™ and CYpher™ Drug Eluting Stents#807200
- The REALITY Study - Head-to-Head Comparison Between Cypher and Taxus#1047092
- A Prospective Comparison Between Ureteral Stent and Nephrostomy Tube for an Urgent Drainage of Obstructed Kidney#1170850
- Antibiotic Prophylaxis for EUS-FNA of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions#1172794
- Endoscopic Abraxane Injection Into Pancreatic Cysts#843184
Record · ID 1060822
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive