arXiv (All)
open access
Mining Legal Arguments in U.S. Corporate Case Law
Legal argument mining supports passage classification, retrieval, and argument completion. This work introduces an expert-annotated dataset of 42 U.S. federal tax opinions on corporate reorganizations under I.R.C. §368. To our knowledge, it is the first expert-annotated, tree-structured argument cor
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Multi-Granularity Argument Mining in Legal Texts#679224
- Using Argument Mining for Legal Text Summarization#679110
- The analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation: approaches from legal theory and argumentation theory#269817
- Mining legal arguments in court decisions#269860
- Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) Amid the Advent of Autonomous AI Legal Reasoning#431441
Record · ID 1061081
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive