arXiv (All)
open access
ReasonLab: A Controlled and Auditable Evaluation of Prompting Techniques for Multiple-Choice QA
Probing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) and building robust solutions for Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) remain central challenges in natural language understanding. Furthermore, the rapid proliferation of LLMs has created the implicit assumption that more sophisticated p
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating Large Language Model Performance on Open-Ended Questions: Answering and Marking Capabilities#1180066
- Option-Aware Retrieval and Task-Specific VLM Adaptation for Medical VQA#1109528
- Load-Bearing Context: The Question Damage Score for Evaluating Context Reliance in Linguistic Reasoning#781051
- Load-Bearing Context: The Question Damage Score for Evaluating Context Reliance in Linguistic Reasoning#779676
- Beyond the Commitment Boundary: Probing Epiphenomenal Chain-of-Thought in Large Reasoning Models#1144827
Record · ID 1061749
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive