arXiv (All)
open access
When Does Execution Provenance Help Agent Memory Retrieval?
A language agent's execution history can exceed its context window, requiring its memory system to retrieve complete supporting evidence under a hard token budget. Evidence may span multiple execution events, yet conventional retrievers use fixed token windows and fixed-k metrics that reward individ
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can LLMs Time Travel? Enhancing Temporal Consistency in Legal Agentic Search through Reinforcement Learning#1036711
- Deepfakes in Court: How Judges Can Proactively Manage Alleged AI-Generated Material in National Security Cases#451751
- An Evidence Model for Agentic Processes: Evidence Claims, Trust Assumptions, and Policy Assessment#667896
- The Verdict’s Office#695988
- LexCLiPR: Cross-Lingual Paragraph Retrieval from Legal Judgments#1178507
Record · ID 1061820
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive