arXiv (All)
open access
Unanimity Without Persuasion: A Single Round of Debate Erases the Disagreement That Verification Needs
A debate panel can become unanimous without becoming more correct. This is dangerous for downstream safeguards: a substituted verification ballot can change only narrow-margin votes, while richer arbiters lose disagreement as a natural targeting signal. We show that one debate round can erase that r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Voteauction: a cautionary tale#444549
- IsabeLLM: Automated Theorem Proving Applied to Formally Verifying Consensus#282836
- Knowledization: Claim-Level Epistemic Control with Admissibility, Source Support, and Real-World Proxy Boundaries#670486
- Knowledization: Claim-Level Epistemic Control with Admissibility, Source Support, and Real-World Proxy Boundaries#668421
- Another Argument Against Uniqueness#762341
Record · ID 1062047
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive