arXiv (All)
open access
Insuring the Fallback: Capacity, Monitoring and the Third Audience in Competence Signalling under Improving AI
When generative AI makes the deliverable uninformative, what a professional services provider can still certify is the preserved human capability to catch the machine's error, and the certifying instrument is a liability pledge whose expected cost falls in that capability. The pledge is credible onl
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Docking Structural Intelligence into the EU AI Act: Minimal Runtime Sheets, Oversight Theater, and Answerable Control in High-Risk AI Systems#204421
- Navigating the AI Job Market: A Survival Guide for the Age of Generative AI#990602
- Offloading Score: Measuring AI Reliance Through Counterfactual Workflows#241568
- Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: On the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk#469588
- Who Benefits from AI? Self-Selection, Skill Gap, and the Hidden Costs of AI Feedback#155505
Record · ID 1062073
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive