arXiv (All)
open access
Coding Agents are Strong Prompt Optimizers
Search-based prompt optimizers improve prompts through iterative search: they propose edits, execute fresh rollouts, score the resulting trajectories, and retain only edits that improve a validation metric. We show that this optimization loop is unnecessary. Given only a static corpus of agent traje
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Imagine Before Retrieval: Prospective Skill Retrieval for LLM Agents#822079
- SLBench: Evaluating How LLM Agents Follow Logical Relations in Skills#361415
- A Phased Workflow for Operating LLM-Based Coding Agents#818756
- A Phased Workflow for Operating LLM-Based Coding Agents#808764
- What Does an Agentic Software Engineering Benchmark Measure? Profiling Task Demands and Agent Behaviour Beyond What Category Labels Reveal#627749
Record · ID 1062161
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive