arXiv (All)
open access
Quantifying Protocol-Induced Uncertainty in Comparative Predictive-Model Evaluation: Evidence from Large-Scale Daily PM10 Forecasting
Comparative studies of predictive models often end by ranking candidate models, yet these rankings depend on evaluation protocols whose influence is rarely treated as a source of uncertainty. We formalize this problem as protocol-induced ranking uncertainty and introduce a framework that compares ra
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reducing Measurement Error in Forecaster Evaluation Using the Wisdom of Crowds#1040335
- Trustworthy Predictive Distributions for Tail Events with Semiparametric Diagnostic Transport Maps#1050836
- Antagonistic Predictions#1092564
- Antagonistic Predictions#1092136
- Event Signature Transfer: Model-Agnostic Forecast Scenario Construction from Historical Events#1048823
Record · ID 1062187
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive