arXiv (All)
open access
Double Descent and Malign Overfitting in Diffusion Models
Conventional wisdom in deep learning holds that overparameterization---having more parameters $p$ than training samples $n$---is benign: larger models generalize better and, even without regularization, interpolating models generalize well, the test error following a double-descent curve. One might
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Double Descent and Malign Overfitting in Diffusion Models#1043111
- A Farewell to the Bias-Variance Tradeoff? An Overview of the Theory of Overparameterized Machine Learning#996846
- The Davis Duality of Approximation and Obstruction: Why Machine Learning Works, Why the Vacuum Has Mass, and the Universal Law of Flat Failure#181370
- Deep Learning Signature for Predicting Occult Nodal Metastasis of Clinical N0 Lung Cancer#1047191
- Deep Learning Enhances Rheological Parameter Determination for Landslide Runout Prediction#182949
Record · ID 1062288
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive