arXiv (All)
open access
Isotopy versus equivariant isotopy in dimensions three and higher
Given a finite group action on a smooth manifold, we study the following question: if two equivariant diffeomorphisms are isotopic, must they be equivariantly isotopic? Birman-Hilden and Maclachlan-Harvey proved the answer is "yes" for most surfaces. By contrast, we give a general criterion in highe
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On gluing and splitting series invariants of plumbed 3-manifolds#149292
- Regularity of profinite isomorphisms of hyperbolic 3-manifolds#1141589
- Isospectral and not strongly isospectral spherical space forms with non-cyclic fundamental group#822338
- Convergence of symmetries: nilpotency, dimension, and perfectness#819027
- Convergence of symmetries: nilpotency, dimension, and perfectness#809035
Record · ID 1062787
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive