arXiv (All)
open access
Med-V1: Small Language Models for Zero-shot and Scalable Biomedical Evidence Attribution
Assessing whether an article supports an assertion is essential for hallucination detection and claim verification. While large language models (LLMs) have the potential to automate this task, achieving strong performance requires frontier models such as GPT-5 that are prohibitively expensive to dep
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Sui Generis: Large Language Models for Authorship Attribution and Verification in Latin#984026
- Can Scientific Claims Be Removed from Large Language Models? A Systematic Evaluation of Claim-Level Unlearning#662146
- Can Scientific Claims Be Removed from Large Language Models? A Systematic Evaluation of Claim-Level Unlearning#661096
- The Cost of Compression: A Rate-Distortion Limit on Factual Hallucination#1000080
- MAPLE: Medical Aspect-Based Summarization with Phrase-Level Evidence#1116188
Record · ID 1063853
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive