arXiv (All)
open access
WhatWorkedBench: Benchmarking Experimental Understanding in AI Agents
AI research agents need reliable knowledge of how their experiments change outcomes. We introduce WhatWorkedBench to measure experimental understanding, the accuracy of predictions about component changes after budgeted experimentation. Agents inspect code, select measurements, and submit a response
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents#1123873
- ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents#1081339
- ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents#919422
- Counterfactual Explanations and the Scope of Contestability#725946
- ToolGate: An Executable Acceptance Pipeline for Tool-Dependent Scientific Benchmark Construction#822473
Record · ID 1064034
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive