arXiv (All)
open access
Same Scores, Different Decisions: Evaluating JEV and Language Models for Legal Document Understanding
Contract inference requires multiple judgments about a shared document, but aggregate accuracy can conceal changes in the individual decisions. Repeated agreement is also insufficient: a model may consistently return the wrong answer. In this paper, we compare Jev with nine language models on Contra
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Technical evaluation of language models adapted for the automation of legal contracts: clause extraction, classification, and summarization.#800
- Leveraging LLM agents and knowledge models for automated legal reasoning#1178520
- Automation of Legal Precedents Retrieval: Findings from a Literature Review#679226
- Automation of legal expertise of agreement texts#1178455
- Finding Written Law#756510
Record · ID 1064222
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive