arXiv (All)
open access
Open Questions Towards Skill-Sustaining Reliance in Reflective AI Engagement
As AI systems are increasingly integrated into professional work, reflection strategies such as cognitive forcing and prompts that foster critical engagement have shown promise in reducing overreliance and improving decision quality. However, these strategies have primarily been evaluated as short-t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Critical Reflection and Governance of AI-Mediated Knowledge Work#651576
- NotebookLM as a Source-Grounded AI Research Assistant: A Narrative Review of Cognitive Load Implications and Research Originality Concerns#691792
- Discipline-Specific AI literacy (DiSAIL): a theoretical framework for situated engagement with generative AI in education#299127
- From Tool to Partner — Intelligence Externalization and Co-Creative Relationships in LMT — Conceptual Foundations#167177
- People Offload Empathy to AI#215933
Record · ID 1064270
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive