arXiv (All)
open access
LabourCrew: A Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Trustworthy Adversarial Deliberation and Statutory Reasoning over Labour Law
In statutory question answering, every claim must be traceable to evidence, not merely relevant, since unverifiable labour-rights answers carry serious legal consequences. Current systems fall short: single-pass RAG cannot detect insufficient evidence, while multi-agent legal-debate systems treat gr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Multi-Agent Debate Strategies: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges#411117
- Maat: The Agentic Legal Research Assistant for Competition Protection#229528
- LexReward: A Taxonomy-Driven Reward Framework for Legal Language Models#1144038
- ArgRE: Formal Argumentation for Conflict Resolution in Multi-Agent Requirements Negotiation#139025
- No Certificate, No Categorical Speech Act: A Brouwerian Assertibility Constraint for Public Reason#690919
Record · ID 1064358
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive