arXiv (All)
open access
Same Team Label, Different Evidence: A Full-Text Audit of Claim Denominators in Human-AI Teaming Research
Human-AI Teaming (HAT) reviews often group studies by labels such as advisor, teammate, or coordinator. Yet the same label can describe one person taking AI advice, several people coordinating around AI, or a workflow that distributes authority and responsibility. Pooling these studies can therefore
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From Matching Models to Recruiting Agents: A Systematized Narrative Review of AI Recruitment Systems, Evaluation, and Governance#927583
- Review of Minds, Causes, and Mechanisms#763766
- An available cue is not an exploited cue: testing whether answer-position bias affects scores in a scenario-based competency assessment#928171
- Predictive Credit: Measuring What Scientific Explanations Add to Experimental Forecasts#1154937
- AI and research, are we (un)consciously guilty?#153529
Record · ID 1064393
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive