arXiv (All)
open access
False-science induction in autonomous scientific discovery
Closed-loop discovery systems increasingly execute experiments and update decisions autonomously, turning record integrity into part of the experimental apparatus. We show that false-science induction arises when legitimate physical objects and measurements are paired incorrectly, driving neural sur
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Inductions, Red Herrings, and the Best Explanation for the Mixed Record of Science#750382
- Gradient-Update Mismatch: Rethinking Conflict-Free Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks#627675
- Scientific Discovery under Validation Congestion via Multi-Fidelity Pairwise Rankings#1157098
- If AI writes the paper, who validates the plankton?: a call to reinvest in empirical expertise before the validation gap becomes irreversible.#330771
- MECHVAR: Variance-Guided Mechanism Discrimination for Autonomous Machine Learning Experiment Selection#1157090
Record · ID 1064427
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive