arXiv (All)
open access
Shutdown Sabotage Propensities in Multi-Agent Systems
The final safeguard against rogue AI behavior is the human ability to shut systems down. It has been theorized that when an AI is instructed to perform a task, self-preservation can emerge as an instrumental subgoal. Here, we test whether AI agents show a propensity to take actions that avoid human
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- (AI Rights 2): AI Safety Through Economic Integration: Why Markets Outperform Control#92270
- Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability#31315
- AI Safety: A Climb To Armageddon?#723468
- Recognition Before Proof: The Asymmetric Ethics of Artificial Consciousness#94903
- Defensive Writing in the Age of AI: Writing to Prove Your Humanity#409861
Record · ID 1064818
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive