arXiv (All)
open access
Fine-Tuning LLMs for Translation: General Forgetting Mitigation Does Not Preserve MT-Specific Instruction Following
Fine-tuning large language models on parallel data improves translation quality but can cause catastrophic forgetting. Mitigation methods are generally evaluated by retention on general benchmarks. We ask whether these findings transfer to machine translation (MT) fine-tuning and to MT-specific inst
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating Open-Weight LLMs for Turkish Domain Documents Under Retrieval and Hardware Constraints#1064551
- The Real Explanation of GPT: A Structural Decomposition of the Large Language Model Black Box#692186
- Temperature Fragility and the Conditional Benefits of Truncation Sampling#1109480
- In-context Learning vs. Instruction Tuning: The Case of Small and Multilingual Language Models#1122404
- Doc2FRC: Length-Consistent Document-Level Machine Translation via Fixed-Range Chunking#1070157
Record · ID 1064998
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive