eScholarship
metadata only
The New Look of Deal Protection
Deal protection in M&A deals evolves in response to Delaware case law and the business goals of acquirers and targets. We construct a new sample of M&A deals from 2003 to 2015 to identify four such areas of evolution in current transactional practice: (1) termination fee “creep,” which was p
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effects of psychological contract breaches on mergers and acquisitions#957786
- A treatise on the rescission of contracts and cancellation of written instruments#199069
- The Artful Dodgers: Securities Fraud, Artful Pleading, and Preemption of State Law Causes of Action Under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act#494834
- Making ‘The principle of honesty’ (objective good faith) measurable and data-driven through the theory of ‘contract with the effect of third party protection’ : an example from European civil law countries#211701
- Does the Prisoner's Dilemma Refute the Coase Theorem?#738189
Record · ID 1065575
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive