Goel v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026canlii98679, 2026 canlii 98679 (fc), 2026, canlii, 98679, (fc), imm-25671-26, 2026, citizenship and immigration, removal, stay of removal, cbsa deferral refusal judicial review, interim stays governed by rjr, macdonald inc v canada (attorney general) and toth v canada (minister of employment and immigration), serious issue, irreparable harm, balance of convenience applied, stay effectively grants relief sought noted, motion dismissed, procedure, interim relief, stay pending judicial review, elevated “serious issue” standard, whether granting relief is “just and equitable in all of the circumstances” (google inc v equustek solutions inc), overlap between serious issue and irreparable harm, three, part test applied in deferral context, motion dismissed, administrative law, discretionary decision, making, deferral of removal, prra eligibility, whether officer erred in finding no new risk factors warranting deferral, reliance on refusal of refugee claim and reconsideration order, reasonableness of refusing deferral to await prra assessed, no serious issue found, motion dismissed, citizenship and immigration, humanitarian and compassionate relief, deferral of removal, stage 1 h&c decision, whether recently filed h&c application required deferral absent “special considerations” or threats to personal safety (baron v canada (minister of public safety and emergency preparedness)), h&c processing continues after departure (palka v canada (public safety and emergency preparedness)), no irreparable harm, motion dismissed, health, mental health, removal assessment, irreparable harm, whether fragile mental health, depression and passive suicidal ideation required deferral, “medical requirements for removal assessment” finding travel “permissible”, mixed medical evidence, “partial remission”, no “acute safety concerns”, past access to psychiatric care in india relied on, motion dismissed