OSF
open access
Genital Modifications and Moral Boundary-making: Medical Perspectives on FGM/C versus FGCS in Belgium and the Netherlands
and-classboundary-workgendernetherlandsraceracial-and-ethnic-minoritiessex-and-gendersocial-and-behavioral-sciences
This chapter investigates how medical professionals who perform female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS) in Belgium and the Netherlands perceive and negotiate the boundary between FGCS and female genital mutilation (FGM). It draws on in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with 11 medical profession
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
OSF
Related documents
- Genital Modifications and Moral Boundary-making: Medical Perspectives on FGM/C versus FGCS in Belgium and the Netherlands#1081981
- Genital Modifications and Moral Boundary-making: Medical Perspectives on FGM/C versus FGCS in Belgium and the Netherlands#1081980
- Genital Modifications and Moral Boundary-making: Medical Perspectives on FGM/C versus FGCS in Belgium and the Netherlands#1081979
- Genital Modifications and Moral Boundary-making: Medical Perspectives on FGM/C versus FGCS in Belgium and the Netherlands#1081977
- Genital Modifications and Moral Boundary-making: Medical Perspectives on FGM/C versus FGCS in Belgium and the Netherlands#1067801
Record · ID 1067799 · SHA-256 181194287ca0a0b3
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive