Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW
metadata only
Fairer Public Benefit in Copyright Law
algorithmsartificial-intelligencebiascopyrightfair-useintellectual-property-lawlaw-and-gendermachine-learning
In 1966, a court considered expressly whether a secondary use of copyrighted works served a public benefit. While public benefit has become a subfactor of the fair use doctrine, it remains undefined, uncodified, and undertheorized. Courts often invoked public benefit in pivotal cases involving novel
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fair Play and Wrongful Benefits#71495
- Beyond Distributive Justice: Hermeneutical Fairness in Ad Delivery#155182
- Brief for Former and Current Law Library Directors, Professors, and Academics as Amici Curiae in Support of Defendant-Appellant#1168969
- Taxation as a Horizontal Contract: A Libertarian Defense of Progressive Taxation#689468
- Selective Judicial Activism in the Equal Protection Context: Democracy, Distrust, and Deconstruction#1019411
Record · ID 1067957
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive