Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Toward a Pragmatic Model of Judicial Decisionmaking: Why Tort Law Provides a Better Framework than Constitutional Law for Deciding the Issue of Medical Futility
Recognizing that courts will eventually have to confront the issue of medical futility, this Comment argues that there is no principled basis for omitting these difficult questions from a legal analysis of the issue and that courts should therefore decide the issue in a manner that honestly confront
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Surgical Arbitration: Excising First Amendment Cataracts from Religious Hierarchical Property Disputes#1021827
- Responsibility and the limits of patient choice#717471
- Ethics of Medical Informatics#1178273
- “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning”#269855
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Foundations, Expansion, and Assessment#335431
Record · ID 1067976
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive