arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Who Judges the Judges? A Chinese Safety QA Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Responses and Safety Judges
Safety benchmarks for large language models often assess the risk of a user query, although the outcome of question answering depends on whether the response violates a policy. This distinction is critical in Chinese harmful-content evaluation, where linguistic variation and adversarial transformati
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Referential Security as a New Paradigm for AI Evaluations#224406
- Rubrics as an Attack Surface: Stealthy Preference Drift in LLM Judges#1109002
- Optimizing the Score, Losing Sight of the Task: Reward Hacking Across Weights, Selection, and Prompts#1061476
- Context Over Content: Exposing Evaluation Faking in Automated Judges#19004
- Validating AI Through Evaluation#370145
Record · ID 1069903
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive