arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
What Does MMLU Actually Measure? A Psychometric Audit of Difficulty Structure in Aggregate Benchmark Scores
Although MMLU is widely adopted as a benchmark for calibrating general AI capabilities, we psychometrically demonstrate that its aggregate score primarily evaluates a model's factual retrieval capacity rather than its reasoning ability. By calibrating item difficulty for 1,000 open-weights language
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Fluency: A Human-Centered Evaluation Rubric for Grounding, Answerability, and Reliability in LLM Outputs#118367
- The Flaw of Averages: Measuring Benchmark-Level Distributional Robustness#972966
- When precision pays: Costs, benefits, and constraints in good-enough production#1078975
- When Guessing is Rewarded: Rethinking Language Model Evaluation with Distributional Uncertainty Scoring#1156215
- Measuring Retrieval: metrics, evidence, and evaluation design for information retrieval and RAG#692203
Record · ID 1070488
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive