arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
How Good Are Frontier Models at Physics? Expert Re-Grading Reveals Broken Evaluations and Near-Saturation of Leading Benchmarks
Low reported scores on leading physics benchmarks, including those featured in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (2026), suggest that frontier language models still struggle with advanced physics, a demanding test of their scientific reasoning and quantitative problem-solving abilities. Yet
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Residuals Are Not Enough: Limits of Physics-Informed Pre-Training for Scientific Foundation Models#1144711
- EarthVerse: Benchmarking Scientific Agents Across Dynamic Earth Systems and Natural Hazards#482163
- Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering#485336
- RTS Smoother-Guided Learning of Physics-Based Neural Differential Models#373379
- Diversifying the Introductory Physics Laboratory.#333333
Record · ID 1070517
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive