arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
The geometry of AI validation: From structural blindness to reusable audits
AI systems increasingly search among candidate answers and deploy the highest-scoring one. Increasing search changes which errors matter, so a precise evaluation at one computation budget can leave another budget unresolved. We connect this information gap to the cost of closing it. For independent
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI Evaluation Should Measure Verification Cost, Not Correctness Alone#441878
- The Credibility Illusion: When AI Writing Fluency Undermines Human Fact-Checking#253459
- Human Oversight and Overload: Two Hidden and Costly Burdens of AI-Assisted Software Engineering#259541
- The Fixation of Belief in Machines: Disciplined Contestation as an Alternative to Mutual Adversarial Oversight#695945
- No Judgment Without a Reason: Counterfactual Receipts for Versioned AI Evaluators#662128
Record · ID 1070909
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive