arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
LLMs or Naive Bayes? Old Gems or New Ways
and-cluster-computingartificial-intelligencec-4computation-and-languagedistributedi-2-7machine-learningparallel
Large language models (LLMs) prompt a recurring question in research computing: should classical methods like Naive Bayes (NB) be retired? We benchmark Complement Naive Bayes against zero-shot and few-shot LLMs spanning four model families and a 37x range in scale (27B to a 1T-parameter mixture-of-e
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Counting Moves, Weighing Voices: Bayesian Dialectical Argumentation for Calibrated Multi-LLM Councils under Persistent Adversaries#1161082
- Counting Moves, Weighing Voices: Bayesian Dialectical Argumentation for Calibrated Multi-LLM Councils under Persistent Adversaries#1157353
- Knowing Your Uncertainty -- On the application of LLM in social sciences#973001
- How can locally deployed large language models improve dataset discovery in open government data portals? / Tobias Siebenlist, Jennifer Gnyp#983226
- Acmite: Mitigating Gender Bias in LLMs through Concept-Guided Mutual Information#1156967
Record · ID 1070993
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive