arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
(How) Do MLLMs Report Bistable Images Like Humans?
Bistable images such as the duck-rabbit are classic stimuli in which one image supports multiple mutually incompatible interpretations, typically reported one at a time in humans. We ask whether multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show similar report behavior and what internal computations supp
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can MLLMs Critique Like Humans? Evaluating Open-Ended Aesthetic Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models#798980
- Can MLLMs Critique Like Humans? Evaluating Open-Ended Aesthetic Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models#797566
- Calibrated Ambiguity in Multimodal Language Models: Humans reach for cultural references, while models describe the picture#1070065
- Forbid Your Attention: Fooling Multimodal Large Language Models by Selectively Removing Intrinsic Focus in Spectral Domain#820798
- Real Images, Worse Judgments: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Concreteness and Imagery#974439
Record · ID 1071060
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive