arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
From Process Loss to Assembly Bonus: Human-Grounded Diagnosis of Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration
LLM agents are increasingly used for collaborative problem solving and human-group simulation. This makes outcome-only evaluation insufficient: if LLM groups are used as models of human groups, we need to know whether they succeed or fail through human-like deliberative mechanisms. We compare human
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Multi-agent Scaling Across Disjunctive and Compensatory Tasks#1106262
- MASTraceBench: Diagnosing Collaboration Gains through Proposal Trajectories in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems#1128765
- You're Hired: Strategic Model Selection for LLM Collaboration#1143417
- Human-LLM Collaborative Workflow for Knowledge Production: A Strength- Limitation Complementarity Framework#691694
- AgentWorld: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Collaboration of Multi-agent LLMs#1106289
Record · ID 1071067
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive