arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
When Compliance Data Masquerades as Evaluation: Measurement Validity for Deployed AI Systems
We argue that a recurring failure in the evaluation of deployed AI systems occurs when data collected for operational monitoring or regulatory compliance are interpreted as if they were designed for comparative evaluation. Automated driving provides a concrete example of this problem. U.S. disengage
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation#999836
- Advancing U.S. Competitiveness Through Governance Tools and Trustworthy Frameworks for Autonomous GenAI Agentic Systems#85579
- Formal Methods Meet LLMs: Auditing, Monitoring, and Intervention for Compliance of Advanced AI Systems#192387
- An Empirical Study and Assessment of EU AI Act Compliance Checkers#1131070
- An Empirical Study and Assessment of EU AI Act Compliance Checkers#1122231
Record · ID 1071412
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive