arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Not all Negation Cues are Equal: Affixal Negations Yield Better Negation Understanding
Negation remains a longstanding challenge for both language models (LMs) and large language models (LLMs). Prior work mainly focuses on a small set of high-frequency single-word negation cues, such as not and never, with limited exploration of broader negation types and modern LLMs. To address this
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do Large Language Models Show Negation Bias? A Replication of Beukeboom et al. (2010)#196189
- Alternative-Space Structure Shapes Negation Resolution in Multimodal Generation#196192
- Refusal Localizes, the Damage Relocates: Safety Layers Under Few-Sample Fine-Tuning#1154943
- Large language models can predict the results of social science experiments#289562
- TAME: Token Attribution and Masking for Emergent misalignment#1122758
Record · ID 1071449
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive