Birkbeck Institutional Research Online
metadata only
Bertrand and Dora Russell on sex, marriage and the rule of fathers
Reviewers of Bertrand Russell’s Marriage and Morals (1929) came to no consensus on the purpose of the work. Some saw it advocating love in marriage, others destroying marriage and still others as an attempt to justify promiscuity. Their confusion is in part due to various tensions in the work. This
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- THE LEGAL STANDING OF MARRIAGE AND ITS SOCIAL ROLES IN SOCIETY#187153
- A comment on the discussion of Conrad Russell's academic freedom#634045
- The doctrine and discipline of divorce : in two books : also the judgement of Martin Bucer : Tetrachordon : and an abridgement of Colasterion#334147
- Review of Against Marriage: An Egalitarian Defence of the Marriage Free State by Clare Chambers#759096
- Russell and Bradley: Rehabilitating the Creation Narrative of Analytic Philosophy#103783
Record · ID 1071545
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive