ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
ACL Versus ALL + ACL Study
The aim of the study is to show a reduction of a re-rupture rate with an ACL (antero crusader ligament) + ALL (anterolateral ligament) combined technique compared to a classical Kenneth-Jones ACL (antero crusader ligament) reconstruction technique.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effects of Early Rehabilitation Using Blood Flow Restriction and/or Surface Electromyography Biofeedback on Quadriceps Activation and Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial#858345
- Comparison of Standard ACL Reconstruction Versus TARS-Augmented Reconstruction#980762
- Prospective Registry of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions#1161431
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle#806099
- Clinical SANTI classification of arthrogenic muscle inhibition has an excellent inter‐rater and intra‐rater reliability in preoperative and post‐operative anterior cruciate ligament rupture#137541
Record · ID 1072600
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive