ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Hybrid vs. Conventional Surgery for Type A Aortic Dissection
This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to compare the clinical efficacy and short-term outcomes of one-stop hybrid surgery versus conventional total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (FET) in patients with acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection. The study evaluates differences in perioperative metrics, postoperative complications, 30-day survival, aortic remodeling, and quality of life.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Open surgery versus branched endovascular repair of the aortic arch in residual dissections after type A surgical repair#126786
- Retrograde Ascending Dissection: Intraluminal Aortic Therapy#1115205
- Endovascular Arch Repair Using a Novel Single Branch Arch Stent Graft: 30-Day Results from the Chronic Dissection Arm of the NEXUS Aortic Arch Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness Investigational Device Exemption Study#393081
- Zenith Alpha™ Abdominal Endovascular Graft#1164515
- Study of the Thoraflex™ Hybrid Device for the Treatment of Aneurysm/Dissection of the Descending Thoracic Aorta#844076
Record · ID 1073090
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive