PhilArchive
open access
Convergence of the source control and actual access accounts of privacy
In this paper, it is argued that, when properly revised in the face of counter-examples, the source control and actual access views of privacy are extensionally equivalent but different in their underlying rationales. In this sense, the source control view and the actual access view, when properly modified to meet counter-examples, can be metaphorically compared to ‘climbing the same mountain but from different sides’ (as Parfit [1] has argued about normative theories). These two views can equally apply to the privacy debates and, thus, resolve a long-standing debate in the literature.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Privacy Rights, and Why Negative Control is Not a Dead End: A Reply to Munch and Lundgren#112021
- Three Control Views on Privacy#752981
- Privacy in Public and the contextual conditions of agency#751322
- Metamodernism and the Question of Privacy and Confidentiality in the Digital Age#93152
- To Believe, or Not to Believe – That is Not the (Only) Question: The Hybrid View of Privacy#91692
Record · ID 107436
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive