ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Multicentric National Italian Analysis of Textbook Outcome in Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide, with more than 1.9 million new cases reported annually. Survival among patients with CRC depends on several factors, including disease stage at diagnosis, the patient's clinical condition, tumour characteristics, and treatment modalities. Despite advances in surgical techniques, active involvement in clinical, translational, and basic research, and improvements in perioperative care, substantial disparities in short- and long-term outcomes persist across healthcare providers and countries. To reduce these variations and improve the quality of cancer care, several metrics have been used to evaluate hospitals, therapeutic approaches, and surgical outcomes. In response to these needs, a composite measure known as "Textbook Outcome" (TO) was developed. It encompasses multiple favourable outcomes and requires patients to meet all essential quality-of-care criteria for a given procedure. TO serves as an effective predictor of survival and is recognised as an indicator of the quality of hospital care. This study aims to investigate the value of TO as an indicator of clinical outcomes and quality of care in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. The primary objective is to assess the achievement of Textbook Outcome criteria in colorectal cancer surgery performed by Italian surgeons. Textbook Outcome is defined by the fulfilment of six key parameters: in-hospital survival, defined as the absence of death during hospitalisation or within 30 days after surgery; radical resection, defined as an R0 resection with at least 12 lymph nodes examined; absence of reoperation; absence of an unplanned stoma; absence of major adverse events, classified according to the Clavien-Dindo criteria as grade III or higher, within 30 days after surgery; and a hospital length of stay of 14 days or less without unplanned readmission. The simultaneous achievement of all six parameters constitutes the optimal outcome, de
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Using Machine Learning to Identify Responders to TACE or HAIC for uHCC#873517
- Quality of Life in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma#892463
- Cetuximab+mFOLFOX6 VS. mFOLFOX6 Alone in RAS/BRAF Wild Type Patients With High-Risk Resectable CRLM#907353
- Human Intestinal Microbiome and Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery#1114889
- HIPEC After Initial CRS in Patients Who Have Received NACT#863067
Record · ID 1074735
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive