ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Isoflurane Versus Propofol for Removal of LMA in Children
The study will be done in paediatric patients by comparing two different techniques of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) removal under deep anesthetic plane. The both study techniques will be compared for safe LMA removal on the basis of adverse airway events and emergence time duration and recovery room stay timing.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Lma-Protector With Endotracheal Tube: Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanical Parameters During Controlled Ventilation & Possibility of Pulmonary Aspiration#836460
- Efficacy of Formoterol vs Ipatropioum Bromide Plus Fenoterol in Children (5-<12 Years) With Acute Bronchial Obstruction#846404
- A New Insertion Technique for Laryngeal Mask Airway#878640
- Dexmedetomidine Versus Sevoflurane in Children With Anticipated Difficult Intubation#912757
- A Study Comparing Two Analgesia/Sedation Regimens, Remifentanil/Propofol Versus Sufentanil/Propofol In Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Patients Requiring Analgesia And Sedation.#899828
Record · ID 1075257
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive