ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Performance of Systane PRO Versus Refresh Optive Mega-3
Single site, prospective, double-masked, randomized-controlled, cross-over study of the subjective and objective performance of 2 different eyedrops. Subjects will be assessed at a screening visit, and 3 follow-up visits. Clinical evaluations will include patient questionnaires.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of the Repeated Usage of Systane Ultra Eyedrop#1100868
- Clinical Evaluation and Comparison of the Tecnis Symfony Optiblue and Tecnis Symfony IOLs#862384
- Clinical Validation of Biofinity Toric MTO (Made To Order) Lenses#902571
- Análisis exómico de pacientes del suroccidente colombiano diagnosticados con glaucoma, en búsqueda de variantes de diagnóstico y respuesta al tratamiento#462297
- A Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of VeriSee GLC for Screening of Glaucoma Suspect Using Color Fundus Images#290895
Record · ID 1075565
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive