Digital Commons @ University of Georgia School of Law
metadata only
Contradictions of Computer-Generated Works’ Protection
Recently, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, in line with several decisions of the U.S. Copyright Office’s Review Board, found that human creativity is the sine qua non of copyrightability, refusing to register a work lacking human creative involvement or control. In this
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Artificial intelligence as producer and consumer of copyright works: evaluating the consequences of algorithmic creativity#270946
- Reconsidering creativity: copyright protection for works generated using artificial intelligence#286844
- Creation and Commercial Value: Copyright Protection of Works of Information#400321
- Lawful Creativity or Creative Lawfulness: CopyrightUser.org at the EYE International Conference 2018#1065683
- Privilege and Property: Essays on the History of Copyright#181298
Record · ID 1075894
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive