Digital Commons @ University of Georgia School of Law
metadata only
Impossibility of Artificial Inventors
Recently, the United Kingdom Supreme Court decided that only natural persons can be considered inventors. A year before, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a similar decision. In fact, so have many of the courts all over the world. This Article analyzes these decisions
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Impossibility of Artificial Inventors#730153
- Artificial intelligence as inventor: exploring the consequences for patent law#270978
- Patent Law and Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Inventorship and Ownership#1176437
- Computers as Inventors – Legal and Policy Implications of Artificial Intelligence on Patent Law#270942
- 35 U.S.C. § 134 — Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board#586637
Record · ID 1075901
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive