arXiv (All)
open access
An Empirical Study of Automating Agent Evaluation
Agent evaluation requires assessing complex multi-step behaviors involving tool use and intermediate reasoning, making it costly and expertise-intensive. A natural question arises: can frontier coding assistants reliably automate this evaluation process? Our study shows that simply prompting coding
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AutoCompact: Learning When to Compact Context in Long-Horizon Coding Agents#1157511
- Reproducibility in the Age of Agentic AI: Context Engineering at the Timescale of a Codebase#999418
- TRUSS: Towards Task-Reliable and User-Safe Automated Agent Skill Generation#463287
- SpecBench: Measuring Reward Hacking in Long-Horizon Coding Agents#987681
- Requirements After the First Edit: Mining Late Requirement Emergence and Rework in Real-World Coding-Agent Sessions#639748
Record · ID 1076077
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive