arXiv (All)
open access
Decision Hijacking: Prompt Injection Attacks on Jev's Typed Probabilistic Decisions
Most studies of prompt injection focus on generative agents, leaving their effects on models with schema-defined outputs unclear. We examine these effects in Jev, a non-generative decision model, using 510 reconstructed InjecAgent cases. Malicious content shifts action probabilities but rarely cause
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Defusing Explosive Prompts: Understanding and Preventing Trigger-Based Prompt Injections in LLM Agents#1037193
- Where Do LLMs Decide to Break the Rules? Mechanistic Localization of Prompt Injection Compliance#1142049
- Where Do LLMs Decide to Break the Rules? Mechanistic Localization of Prompt Injection Compliance#1122191
- Agentic Cloud Decoys: A Deception-Driven Framework for Autonomous Intrusion Investigation#405549
- TEMPO-Diffusion: Temporally Exposed Malicious Poisoning of Diffusion Models#310769
Record · ID 1076269
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive