arXiv (All)
open access
Human-AI-Powered Hypothesis Testing: Cost-Aware Selective AI Scoring and Sequential Human Escalation
Large language models are increasingly used as inexpensive judges to evaluate outputs, label data, and assess whether a system meets a desired quality standard. Yet using AI judgments for formal statistical inference is fundamentally different from simply treating them as ground-truth labels: AI eva
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Calibrating Small Language Models for Claim Check-Worthiness Detection#820696
- Hu-CEMNIST: A Benchmark Dataset of Human-Generated Counterfactual Explanations for MNIST#1110858
- AutoCRAT: Within-trajectory Joint Control of Stochasticity and Compute for LLM Reasoning#799234
- AutoCRAT: Within-trajectory Joint Control of Stochasticity and Compute for LLM Reasoning#797811
- Inverse Turing Bench: Evaluating Language Models as Judges of Human vs. AI Dialogue#998271
Record · ID 1076515
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive