arXiv (All)
open access
Generative crystallographic phasing through invariant relationships
Crystal structure determination requires the phases of scattered waves -- yet diffraction measures only their intensities. Direct methods exploit phase invariants but become less reliable as diffraction information diminishes. Learned phase prediction has lowered the resolution barrier, yet remains
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- uFlowCSP: Crystal Structure Prediction using Mean flow generative models#996619
- Deep Generative Crystal Structure Prediction: A Benchmark Study and a Controlled Test of Prototype Dependence#1062393
- Deep Generative Crystal Structure Prediction: A Benchmark Study and a Controlled Test of Prototype Dependence#1043101
- Synthesizability Prediction of Crystalline Structures with Structure-Aware Feature Learning and Uncertainty Quantification#974247
- EP-Flow: Disordered Crystal Structure Prediction without Site-Level Annotations#1156587
Record · ID 1076643
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive